Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
Forum rules
Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
If you are not able to post in here, you are not a Certified™ Player™. Play on a mainline /tg/ game server to gain posting powers in this forum. (certified gamers are only calculated once per day)
Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
If you are not able to post in here, you are not a Certified™ Player™. Play on a mainline /tg/ game server to gain posting powers in this forum. (certified gamers are only calculated once per day)
- Constellado
- Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2021 1:59 pm
- Byond Username: Constellado
- Location: The country that is missing on world maps.
Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=36029
Oh boy. This appeal looks very convincing.
Even with the best preparations... He got banned. Because some guy gets executed with your super safe SM design.
Rip.
Oh boy. This appeal looks very convincing.
Even with the best preparations... He got banned. Because some guy gets executed with your super safe SM design.
Rip.
- Justice12354
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2021 1:41 am
- Byond Username: Justice12354
- iansdoor
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2021 2:49 am
- Byond Username: Iansdoor
- Location: Texas
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
Shard had a low kill count, only dusted 3 non-antags and one wasn't consented! but all of this, what humors me reviewing checking the logs I had to do. Arar was actively trying to make SM better during our ticket. I don't know if that scores brownie points for radiation. Christ.
An average yellow rock hater and the main reason you may get your shuttle recalled.
- britgrenadier1
- Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2023 9:47 am
- Byond Username: Britgrenadier1
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
-
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2020 7:37 am
- Byond Username: ItzRiumz
- Location: Drifting between Manny and Sybil
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
Terry's most safe SM setup (It has only killed 3 people)
-
- Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2023 9:02 pm
- Byond Username: Redbert
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
ah the old delivery chute into SM. The entrance that is there by default, easy to accidentally walk into, and too far away from the destination to see what's at the exit. very safe, very non-antag esque
-
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2019 12:39 am
- Byond Username: Gameaddict07
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
That ban reason.
And then the ticket. The admin says they asked the HoS if they approved of the SM and the HoS said no, but the logs say otherwise:
And the HoS tells them that they did ask them about the SM. The admin ignores this, instead focusing on the fact that they were referred to ICly as "centcom officials", tells them "your SM is interesting and has dusted a few folks since its front of security" (why did they say it dusted only one person in the ban reason?), does not interact with the player any further, and then bans them 22 minutes later.
What does it even mean? "This is second time in 24 hours that your radiation projects in up in security area."? "You also went on half and question the HoS ofr the ahelp on the behalf on "centcom""? I know some admins are ESL but this was actually incomprehensible to me without the context provided by the player. Judging by that context it also seems wrong - if the issue was someone getting dusted, what does radiation have to do with it?As a non-antag Atmos tech, had a failure of confirmation to build a SM shard in front brig, resulting in one security officer dusting someone in. This is second time in 24 hours that your radiation projects in up in security area. You also went on half and question the HoS ofr the ahelp on the behalf on "centcom". Players can't duscuss adminhalps ICly, it's OOC information in IC.
And then the ticket. The admin says they asked the HoS if they approved of the SM and the HoS said no, but the logs say otherwise:
Admin provides what is presumably the HoS's response to them questioning them about being asked for permission for the SM, "nope? I was just like sure someone else did before me." But they don't provide what they asked specifically. I feel that's important because this admin doesn't seem to have a full grasp on the English language and might have worded their question awkwardly/incorrectly, or incorrectly interpreted the HoS's answer. Then they start getting on the player's case over them trying to ICly gather proof from the HoS that they did in fact ask if the SM was alright to have around. I don't blame the player at all there, since the admin is claiming that they did NOT ask the HoS about the SM, and that the HoS told them likewise.08:58:01 SAY H3skan/(Arar 'Makita' Dreizehn) (mob_3450) "this is fine right" (106, 160, 2) Fore Primary Hallway
08:58:04 SAY H3skan/(Arar 'Makita' Dreizehn) (mob_3450) "secoff said yes" (106, 160, 2) Fore Primary Hallway
08:58:04 SAY Lizardboreansupersoldier/(Michel Garland) (mob_3414) "ye" (108, 159, 2) Fore Primary Hallway
Spoiler:
- mrmelbert
- In-Game Game Master
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:26 pm
- Byond Username: Mr Melbert
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
It's safe compared to the "average" supermatter setup
Unfortunately the "average" supermatter setup is statistically skewed from all the times a supermatter shard gets misplaced or misused, making "comparatively safe to other supermatters" not actually all that safe
Unfortunately the "average" supermatter setup is statistically skewed from all the times a supermatter shard gets misplaced or misused, making "comparatively safe to other supermatters" not actually all that safe
Admin: December 2020 - Present
Code Maintainer: December 2021 - Present
Head Admin: Feburary 2022 - September 2022
Youtube Guy: sometimes
Code Maintainer: December 2021 - Present
Head Admin: Feburary 2022 - September 2022
Youtube Guy: sometimes
- Archie700
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 1:56 am
- Byond Username: Archie700
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
SM produces radiation by default.gameaddict07 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2024 2:09 am That ban reason.
What does it even mean? "This is second time in 24 hours that your radiation projects in up in security area."? "You also went on half and question the HoS ofr the ahelp on the behalf on "centcom""? I know some admins are ESL but this was actually incomprehensible to me without the context provided by the player. Judging by that context it also seems wrong - if the issue was someone getting dusted, what does radiation have to do with it?As a non-antag Atmos tech, had a failure of confirmation to build a SM shard in front brig, resulting in one security officer dusting someone in. This is second time in 24 hours that your radiation projects in up in security area. You also went on half and question the HoS ofr the ahelp on the behalf on "centcom". Players can't duscuss adminhalps ICly, it's OOC information in IC.
Also this wasn't the first radiation project they made.
Could stand to be more clear though
- TypicalRig
- Joined: Sat May 01, 2021 8:18 pm
- Byond Username: TypicalRig
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
nobody is forced to make a SM in a highly public area. you take the risk of doing the funny you eat the punishment when it goes wrong in any capacity with no right to complain. this goes for any gimmick
-
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 5:43 pm
- Byond Username: Sheltton
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
hot take, doing silly, potentially unsafe gimmicks is fine every once in while as long as its oked by the captain and head of the department's its happening in, players are able to avoid the possible danger it poses & the player in question takes reasonable precautions like what this player said they did. It spices up the around without relying on antags to do it & as long as players are bitching about you doing it too much in discord/ooc its fine. If a player that isn't cap/the head doesn't want doing it they have 3 options, alt f4 if they don't wanna deal with it, talk with their head/captain or take matters into their own hands. I think allowing players to do silly shit in game adds to the round & can create decent conflict as long as its done in moderation.
To add on as long as the command staff isn't approving silly projects too often it is also fine and I don't think they should be accountable ooc
To add on as long as the command staff isn't approving silly projects too often it is also fine and I don't think they should be accountable ooc
- Nist
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2020 5:29 am
- Byond Username: Nist
- Location: Sloth
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
Incredibly based SM.britgrenadier1 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2024 1:24 am
"Safe" SM. Open air, anyone can walk in, infront of a delivery chute, brig cells are nice and toasty (Iansdoor doesn't understand this as Europe does not have AC). Very safe/10.
- BonChoi
- Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2018 1:07 pm
- Byond Username: BonChoi
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
This ban is justified and deserved, but I agree with gameaddict07. The ban reason is sloppy, even coming from someone that is ESL, and I can imagine that if the ban reason is that sloppy that there are holes elsewhere in the tickets.
Another bad take provided by yours truly.
Istoprocent1 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 4:36 pm Baseless claims. I have been to the vault minimum of 38 times, how many suicides?
- BonChoi
- Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2018 1:07 pm
- Byond Username: BonChoi
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
The second response from iansdoor is a lot better out together though, so that's cool.
Another bad take provided by yours truly.
Istoprocent1 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 4:36 pm Baseless claims. I have been to the vault minimum of 38 times, how many suicides?
- iansdoor
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2021 2:49 am
- Byond Username: Iansdoor
- Location: Texas
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
Yeah... you know being up for like 19 hours and trying to talk with folks in "late" night for me. Not the best of ideas. I gave them what I was looking at before, I went to bed. Then I really thought thru the logs this morning and looking at how to improve myself, what to actual look for. I did come across gold! The intern Security officer caught the clown and flexed on them.
20:41:08.494] SAY: Redemptionarc/(Aoife Everwood) "gonna CRY?" (Brig (100,165,2))
20:41:12.632] EMOTE: Redemptionarc/(Aoife Everwood) FLEXES (Brig (100,165,2))
20:41:15.437] SAY: Redemptionarc/(Aoife Everwood) "yeah" (Brig (100,165,2))
20:41:18.535] SAY: Redemptionarc/(Aoife Everwood) "yeah i am a bitch" (Brig (101,165,2))
20:41:22.094] SAY: Redemptionarc/(Aoife Everwood) "im the cutest bitch in the world" (Brig (101,165,2))
20:41:39.921] SAY: Redemptionarc/(Aoife Everwood) "you cant have a trial unless HoS verifies it" (Brig (100,165,2))
An average yellow rock hater and the main reason you may get your shuttle recalled.
- DrAmazing343
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2023 11:06 pm
- Byond Username: DrAmazing343
- Location: right here :3
- Contact:
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
I need to track down this secoff for a flex-off
- Constellado
- Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2021 1:59 pm
- Byond Username: Constellado
- Location: The country that is missing on world maps.
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
LOL THE WAY THE APPEALANT EXPLAINED IT MADE IT SOUND SUPER SAFE AHAHAHHAHAH
- mrmelbert
- In-Game Game Master
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:26 pm
- Byond Username: Mr Melbert
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
Admin: December 2020 - Present
Code Maintainer: December 2021 - Present
Head Admin: Feburary 2022 - September 2022
Youtube Guy: sometimes
Code Maintainer: December 2021 - Present
Head Admin: Feburary 2022 - September 2022
Youtube Guy: sometimes
- Blacklist897
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2023 5:48 am
- Byond Username: Blacklist897
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
profile picture by "Cowboy Owlbear"
I play alexander Moore on Manuel
I play alexander Moore on Manuel
- kinnebian
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2021 2:15 pm
- Byond Username: Kinnebian
- Location: answering irelands call
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
respect (let him do his thing)
- Scriptis
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2021 12:05 am
- Byond Username: Scriptis
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
now this. this right here is some rule 0 territory
-
- Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2021 11:08 pm
- Byond Username: MooCow12
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
Okay so im looking at the code and i think only plastitanium glass actually has good rad insulation, reinforced/normal plasma glass is bait and doesnt seem to have any.
https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/ ... ow.dm#L820
name = "plastitanium window"
(snip)
rad_insulation = RAD_EXTREME_INSULATION
Nevermind reinforced plasma has heavy plasma insulation and non reinforced plasma has medium
name = "plasma window"
(snip)
rad_insulation = RAD_MEDIUM_INSULATION
name = "reinforced plasma window"
(snip)
rad_insulation = RAD_HEAVY_INSULATION
The only thing that seems to block radiation spread entirely 100% is rad collectors and as we all know they were removed...which means SM setups will never be as safe as they were when rad collectors were obtainable.
But you can still probably block almost all radiation by using multiple layers of reinforced plasma glass windows (The thin variants) 2 of them should give more effective rad insulation per tile than plastitanium glass and you can technically have 4 per tile.
If thin variants dont work then just use 2 layers of plastitanium glass and not only will it block almost all radiation from coming out it will protect everyone in the event that the sm shard blows up or something.
https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/ ... ow.dm#L820
name = "plastitanium window"
(snip)
rad_insulation = RAD_EXTREME_INSULATION
Nevermind reinforced plasma has heavy plasma insulation and non reinforced plasma has medium
name = "plasma window"
(snip)
rad_insulation = RAD_MEDIUM_INSULATION
name = "reinforced plasma window"
(snip)
rad_insulation = RAD_HEAVY_INSULATION
The only thing that seems to block radiation spread entirely 100% is rad collectors and as we all know they were removed...which means SM setups will never be as safe as they were when rad collectors were obtainable.
But you can still probably block almost all radiation by using multiple layers of reinforced plasma glass windows (The thin variants) 2 of them should give more effective rad insulation per tile than plastitanium glass and you can technically have 4 per tile.
If thin variants dont work then just use 2 layers of plastitanium glass and not only will it block almost all radiation from coming out it will protect everyone in the event that the sm shard blows up or something.
List of my favorite TG Staff.
Spoiler:
- BonChoi
- Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2018 1:07 pm
- Byond Username: BonChoi
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
I wonder if this part is getting looked over too much, if what they're saying is true then I believe that they would've had no particular hand in irradiating security (although the supermatter shard being out in the open is kinda the reason, the borg dismantling some of the protection (FNR?) might be the cause of security getting a little toasty.)Heskan wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2024 10:57 am The picture above is after the borg has removed two layers of rplasmaglass and one can clearly see that the shard is still not taking issue with it. The layers of radiation shielding were by all means sufficient even when things were thrown in, and as a failsafe there were ample radiation meds provided which this roundend picture also does not show, since they got dragged in and dusted after said borg took the glass away. The setup was, prior to interference, one other people and I have often put on BYOS shuttles and whatnot.
Of course, all of this could've been avoided if they had just not built the SM shard setup in front of security, but it seems like a lot of other players failed this guy and now they're getting ultimately punished for it, which is alright I guess. I just hope that next time they'll remove all ways to access the shard whatsoever and that they'll beat the piss out of anyone that tries to dismantle the safeties, we'll see.
P.S. I originally posted this in the actual ban appeals thread, point and laugh at me please.
Another bad take provided by yours truly.
Istoprocent1 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 4:36 pm Baseless claims. I have been to the vault minimum of 38 times, how many suicides?
- TheSmallBlue
- Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2019 3:55 pm
- Byond Username: SmallBlue
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
Very funny image melbert, big fan, however, I would like to present to the nutting court exhibit B: the guy says that eventually a reporter cyborg sabotaged this man's beautiful work by removing some plasma glass. It just so happens that there's a perfectly sized plasma-glass sized hole to the right. The "maze or plasma glass" might have been real at one point.
- EmpressMaia
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2022 8:22 pm
- Byond Username: EmpressMaia
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
who up irradiating they brig
- BonChoi
- Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2018 1:07 pm
- Byond Username: BonChoi
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
Uh, he got a job ban as well? What did he do?
Another bad take provided by yours truly.
Istoprocent1 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 4:36 pm Baseless claims. I have been to the vault minimum of 38 times, how many suicides?
-
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2019 12:39 am
- Byond Username: Gameaddict07
- BonChoi
- Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2018 1:07 pm
- Byond Username: BonChoi
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
This has to be one of the strangest appeals I've seen in a while.
Another bad take provided by yours truly.
Istoprocent1 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 4:36 pm Baseless claims. I have been to the vault minimum of 38 times, how many suicides?
- Constellado
- Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2021 1:59 pm
- Byond Username: Constellado
- Location: The country that is missing on world maps.
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
Imho if the public supermatter does not blow up, make a fire or kill a person BY ACCIDENT we are good. Radiation is annoying but all you need *in my opinion* is a ton of radiation signs everywhere
From what I can tell the people died there by another person's hand putting them in on purpose... Why wouldn't sec use a public easy to access execution chamber...
From what I can tell the people died there by another person's hand putting them in on purpose... Why wouldn't sec use a public easy to access execution chamber...
- BonChoi
- Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2018 1:07 pm
- Byond Username: BonChoi
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
What I want to know is if the HoS really did approve it, Heskan keeps providing log entries of the HoS saying "ye" to it but iansdoor just keeps going "No, that didn't happen." Weird.
Another bad take provided by yours truly.
Istoprocent1 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 4:36 pm Baseless claims. I have been to the vault minimum of 38 times, how many suicides?
- iansdoor
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2021 2:49 am
- Byond Username: Iansdoor
- Location: Texas
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
In the ticket of theirs, I give them the exact wording of what the Michael Garland said to me "nope? I was just like sure someone else did before me." The only other person is Aoife Everwood and looking at that conversation. Arar wasn't part of it? did I read that wrong?
This appeal sucks because I am not sure when they stopped playing Arar and went on the ooc in ic damage control. My ticket warped their round from the norm and all I can see is that when they are caught in a radiation project, without ic permission and couldn't really explain the any conversation other than I saw them but boggles me that they didn't even point out Aoife Everwood the OG person.
They talked to and tunneled on Michael Garland to prove me that they did get permission, that HoS was under the impression that someone give permission to Arar. That reality was no one did, every a okay was just Arar and their assuming and the placement and radiation was annoying to security.
This is round after where they placed an HFR in detectives room for petty reasons.
What is this SM spot for?
iansdoor ➡ h3skan
2024-04-06 21:12:02
The checklist! Sec and the hos agreed on it, thing's safe in terms of rads.
h3skan ➡ iansdoor
2024-04-06 21:12:26
I am not seeing the HoS sign off on it. did you ask the captain or warden?
iansdoor ➡ h3skan
2024-04-06 21:15:31
the hos, pretty sure?
h3skan ➡ iansdoor
2024-04-06 21:15:40
like the guy in full riot gear, 99% sure i didnt hallucinate the hos card
h3skan ➡ iansdoor
2024-04-06 21:15:55
Nope, I just asked him. he wasn't near you at all and he didn't sign off on that. So who did you talk to?
iansdoor ➡ h3skan
2024-04-06 21:20:32
he literally just confirmed a second time i talked to him before starting it
h3skan ➡ iansdoor
2024-04-06 21:22:17
nope? I was just like sure someone else did before me. this is what he told me. He wasn't there for the decision. Arar, what is the purpose of the checklist?
iansdoor ➡ h3skan
2024-04-06 21:23:18
Was it Aoife Everwood?
iansdoor ➡ h3skan
2024-04-06 21:25:21
21:13:06.073] ADMIN: Iansdoor/(Vents-Hot-Air) checked the individual player panel for Lizardboreansupersoldier/(Michel Garland). HoS
21:15:39.801] ADMIN: Iansdoor/(Vents-Hot-Air) checked the individual player panel for HomoBird/(Honda Mothra). warden
21:18:04.528] ADMIN: Iansdoor/(Vents-Hot-Air) checked the individual player panel for *no key*/(Maks Glen). security
21:18:28.634] ADMIN: Iansdoor/(Vents-Hot-Air) checked the individual player panel for VelocityMagnet/(Ronald Burns). Captain
21:18:49.128] ADMIN: Iansdoor/(Vents-Hot-Air) checked the individual player panel for Redemptionarc/(Aoife Everwood). Security
An average yellow rock hater and the main reason you may get your shuttle recalled.
- BonChoi
- Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2018 1:07 pm
- Byond Username: BonChoi
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
Okay so is this part being made up by the appellant or is it inadmissible for any reason? I don't understand because it seems like the HoS walks past the supermatter where the engineer points it out and asks if it's okay, to which the HoS replies "ye" which I would certainly take as an approval.Heskan wrote: ↑Thu Apr 11, 2024 2:29 pm 20:57:58.311] H3skan/(Arar 'Makita' Dreizehn) points at the floor (Fore Primary Hallway (106,160,2))
20:58:01.114] SAY: H3skan/(Arar 'Makita' Dreizehn) "this is fine right" (Fore Primary Hallway (106,160,2))
20:58:04.227] SAY: H3skan/(Arar 'Makita' Dreizehn) "secoff said yes" (Fore Primary Hallway (106,160,2))
20:58:04.452] SAY: Lizardboreansupersoldier/(Michel Garland) "ye" (Fore Primary Hallway (108,159,2))
20:58:55.785] SAY: H3skan/(Arar 'Makita' Dreizehn) "i made second sm at sec" (Fore Primary Hallway (104,160,2))
Another bad take provided by yours truly.
Istoprocent1 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 4:36 pm Baseless claims. I have been to the vault minimum of 38 times, how many suicides?
- iansdoor
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2021 2:49 am
- Byond Username: Iansdoor
- Location: Texas
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
You pulled exactly what confuses me. 20:58:04.227] SAY: H3skan/(Arar 'Makita' Dreizehn) "secoff said yes" (Fore Primary Hallway (106,160,2))BonChoi wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 1:00 pmOkay so is this part being made up by the appellant or is it inadmissible for any reason? I don't understand because it seems like the HoS walks past the supermatter where the engineer points it out and asks if it's okay, to which the HoS replies "ye" which I would certainly take as an approval.Heskan wrote: ↑Thu Apr 11, 2024 2:29 pm 20:57:58.311] H3skan/(Arar 'Makita' Dreizehn) points at the floor (Fore Primary Hallway (106,160,2))
20:58:01.114] SAY: H3skan/(Arar 'Makita' Dreizehn) "this is fine right" (Fore Primary Hallway (106,160,2))
20:58:04.227] SAY: H3skan/(Arar 'Makita' Dreizehn) "secoff said yes" (Fore Primary Hallway (106,160,2))
20:58:04.452] SAY: Lizardboreansupersoldier/(Michel Garland) "ye" (Fore Primary Hallway (108,159,2))
20:58:55.785] SAY: H3skan/(Arar 'Makita' Dreizehn) "i made second sm at sec" (Fore Primary Hallway (104,160,2))
WHO said that, at this point again.
An average yellow rock hater and the main reason you may get your shuttle recalled.
- BonChoi
- Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2018 1:07 pm
- Byond Username: BonChoi
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
This conversation literally took place in front of the SM shard with the HoS directly looking at it and saying "yes" it was okay before it was turned on.iansdoor wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 1:03 pmYou pulled exactly what confuses me. 20:58:04.227] SAY: H3skan/(Arar 'Makita' Dreizehn) "secoff said yes" (Fore Primary Hallway (106,160,2))BonChoi wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 1:00 pmOkay so is this part being made up by the appellant or is it inadmissible for any reason? I don't understand because it seems like the HoS walks past the supermatter where the engineer points it out and asks if it's okay, to which the HoS replies "ye" which I would certainly take as an approval.Heskan wrote: ↑Thu Apr 11, 2024 2:29 pm 20:57:58.311] H3skan/(Arar 'Makita' Dreizehn) points at the floor (Fore Primary Hallway (106,160,2))
20:58:01.114] SAY: H3skan/(Arar 'Makita' Dreizehn) "this is fine right" (Fore Primary Hallway (106,160,2))
20:58:04.227] SAY: H3skan/(Arar 'Makita' Dreizehn) "secoff said yes" (Fore Primary Hallway (106,160,2))
20:58:04.452] SAY: Lizardboreansupersoldier/(Michel Garland) "ye" (Fore Primary Hallway (108,159,2))
20:58:55.785] SAY: H3skan/(Arar 'Makita' Dreizehn) "i made second sm at sec" (Fore Primary Hallway (104,160,2))
WHO said that, at this point again.
Another bad take provided by yours truly.
Istoprocent1 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 4:36 pm Baseless claims. I have been to the vault minimum of 38 times, how many suicides?
- Constellado
- Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2021 1:59 pm
- Byond Username: Constellado
- Location: The country that is missing on world maps.
Re: Banned for making a safe Supernutter.
The word of the HoS is above word of a sec off.
If he says secoff said yes, and you are confused ask about THAT not about permission from the hos.
But even then if he was mistaken and misunderstood some sec off thing... The HoS word is above the sec offs word. And he said ye.
If he says secoff said yes, and you are confused ask about THAT not about permission from the hos.
But even then if he was mistaken and misunderstood some sec off thing... The HoS word is above the sec offs word. And he said ye.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users