Page 1 of 1

Can someone explain why it violates the rules to sass admin, but not for AI to ruin a child?

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 6:41 am
by Toronto88
At 11:36 PM I was playing on the station. My five 5 year old son often sits in the room with me during my SS13 time (3 hours daily) so that I can keep watch over him. During this time, I give him an iPad to play with so that he may enrich himself by browsing wikipedia articles and watching informative youtube sessions.I find that it is hard to keep a child entertained without something like this, so it is a huge help to him that I am able to provide him with this iPad time. By giving him the iPad, he has the sum of all human knowledge at his fingertips. The world is his oyster when he plays with the iPad.

During our scheduled study session today, I had just finished a round. As it was ending, my son asked me how I did. I said, "Good son, what are you working on?" He had spent the past 15 minutes reading about Sasini Tea & Coffee on wikpedia (this is one of Kenya's major tea and coffee producers, and is one of the country's "Big 6" tea producers). As you can see, he is a smart kid with a lot of potential. Suddenly my jaw dropped, some joker who was playing AI had decided to spam over the vox "Johnson! Johnson! Johnson ass! Ass johnson! WANKER WANKER WANKER WANKER WANKER WANKER! [Emphasis Mine]", with my son right there in the room.

He immediately perked up and asked me what wanker means, I wasn't thinking and lied. I told him it was someone whose job it is to help direct cranes to the points where loads are attached and detached. He said ok and went back to studying on his iPad. About another 40 minutes pass and it's time for him to go to bed. I send him off to sleep and decide to see what else he was researching on his iPad. I typically examine my son's search history each night after iPad time in order to see what topics he learned about, so that I can discuss them the next day. We have identified many areas of interest for him this way (game design, architecture, math, etc.. my son is proficient in the use of multiple CAD software already due to this practice). To my horror, what I found was not the objects of scholarly interest but a laundry list of wanker related searches.

"wanker"
"what is wanker"
"wanking"
"wanker"
"wanker in ass"
"wanker in johnson"
"wanker johnson ass"
"johnson in ass"
"why johnson in ass"
"wanking ass"


The list could go on. You get the point. I was mortified. Not only did the AI flippantly expose my son to the concept of sexual intercourse (something that he should not be learning about til a much later age), not only was the exposure to positively filthy online content rather than examples of healthy pair-bonding, the AI also caused me to LIE to my son's face in order to try and protect him from this violation of our privacy. My son has now seen and learned things that will confuse his tiny brain, and he will never be able to look at the world in the same way. This will likely warp his ability to socialize with his peers for decades to come. Currently, I am sitting here with the deepest of pits in my stomach. I don't know what to do. This is the absolute worst thing that could have happened to my son, and he will not even be able to understand the damage done. His youthful curiosity has cost him his innocence, and it was not his fault in the slightest. It was the AI's fault.

I tried to speak to the admins and players about the situation and was completely disrespected. I cannot tell if they are not parents themselves and simply can't comprehend the gravity of a situation like this, or if they are truly so deranged and anti-social that they find themselves indifferent or even pleased by hearing about what has happened.

Image
Image
Image

To reiterate, I am sitting here both heartbroken and mortified. My son is currently asleep with not only the knowledge of what a johnson is, that it can go in someone's ass, and wanker, but also knowing that his dad is willing to lie to him (something I have never done before and never intended to). The AI has overstepped his boundaries in ways that can hardly be put into words. This is like walking into a stranger's family room and putting hardcore pornography on the television. The AI must be punished for this. This cannot be allowed to occur, ever again, on the server. I'd say that removing the ability for the AI to curse would solve the problem, but people would likely find another way to harass and corrupt the children of other players.

Frankly I am just at a loss for words and don't know what to do. I need help. I never in my life thought this would happen to me.

Re: Can someone explain why it violates the rules to sass admin, but not for AI to ruin a child?

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 6:50 am
by bman
we need to ban wanker

Re: Can someone explain why it violates the rules to sass admin, but not for AI to ruin a child?

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 7:49 am
by Recurracy
look man, youre playing ss13, a game thats known to have stupid shit thrown about every single round, with your kid in the room without headphones
you shoulda put headphones on at the least

Re: Can someone explain why it violates the rules to sass admin, but not for AI to ruin a child?

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 8:10 am
by Lumbermancer
Dad?

Re: Can someone explain why it violates the rules to sass admin, but not for AI to ruin a child?

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 9:35 am
by Floiven
I want you to know that I appreciate the effort you put into these kind of posts

Re: Can someone explain why it violates the rules to sass admin, but not for AI to ruin a child?

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 10:08 am
by TrustyGun
Just don't have children, it's that simple

Re: Can someone explain why it violates the rules to sass admin, but not for AI to ruin a child?

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 3:16 pm
by bman
this is a tragedy we MUST stop

Re: Can someone explain why it violates the rules to sass admin, but not for AI to ruin a child?

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 4:20 pm
by gum disease
it being marked as an ic issue made me laff

Re: Can someone explain why it violates the rules to sass admin, but not for AI to ruin a child?

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 4:54 pm
by obscolene
Toronto88 wrote:At 11:36 PM
That's 2 minutes before the original Burger King Foot Lettuce post was created.

Re: Can someone explain why it violates the rules to sass admin, but not for AI to ruin a child?

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 5:15 pm
by BeeSting12
Can I get the round ID and AI name? I'll investigate it for you.

Re: Can someone explain why it violates the rules to sass admin, but not for AI to ruin a child?

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 5:19 pm
by BeeSting12
Your kid also sounds really smart. I expect great things frm him

Re: Can someone explain why it violates the rules to sass admin, but not for AI to ruin a child?

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 6:09 pm
by Cobby
Wanker

Re: Can someone explain why it violates the rules to sass admin, but not for AI to ruin a child?

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 6:40 pm
by subject217
beepsky also happens to say "wanker" in his famous phrase "FUCK YOUR CUNT YOU SHIT EATING COCKSTORM AND EAT A DONG FUCKING ASS RAMMING SHIT FUCK EAT PENISES IN YOUR FUCK FACE AND SHIT OUT ABORTIONS OF FUCK AND POO AND SHIT IN YOUR ASS YOU COCK FUCK SHIT MONKEY FUCK ASS WANKER FROM THE DEPTHS OF SHIT."

this is too lewd for /tg/ station, we need to remove this reference to a sexual act immediately

Re: Can someone explain why it violates the rules to sass admin, but not for AI to ruin a child?

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 7:51 pm
by John_Oxford
ban all automatic wanker machines now

#prayersforwankersson

Re: Can someone explain why it violates the rules to sass admin, but not for AI to ruin a child?

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2018 8:49 pm
by iksyp
never leave tonto

Re: Can someone explain why it violates the rules to sass admin, but not for AI to ruin a child?

Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2018 7:55 am
by Deitus
i was the ai that round and just in case anyone is even thinking of taking this seriously in any way i only spammed "wanker" and not johnson in the ass or whatever
>inb4 people still unironically take this bait

Re: Can someone explain why it violates the rules to sass admin, but not for AI to ruin a child?

Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:56 pm
by MrAlphonzo
Protect Tonto at all costs.

Re: Can someone explain why it violates the rules to sass admin, but not for AI to ruin a child?

Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 10:54 am
by Recurracy
fuck i been had
i got gullible written all over my fuckin forehead

Re: Can someone explain why it violates the rules to sass admin, but not for AI to ruin a child?

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 1:40 pm
by callanrockslol
Tontos unbanned right?